A Quick Update on the Google Panda (…I Mean Farmer) Update

As you know from previous reports, Google recently did a major update to its algorithm. Many sites in the U.S. were affected and noticed as much as a 50% decline in U.S. based traffic.

With that said, you should have seen some activity (…or inactivity rather) in site traffic to warrant concern.

I’ll be back Monday to explain what factors led to sites being downgraded in their organic rankings…if you’ve been affected or need to know to prevent future slaps on the wrist, come back Monday to see exactly which parameters Google slapped the stick to in its recent update.

But what’s the deal with such a dramatic move out of the blue?

As we said before, Google wants to return relevant, informative sites to its users. That’s one of the chief reasons we recommend good, steady content development.

But on a larger scale, Google’s sudden update has many concerned at how such moves can have dramatic effects on other companies’ bottom line…according CNN report, over $1 billion in capital changed hands.

Some firms like Mahalo.com have been cutting staff while others are scrambling to find help to meet their skyrocketing demand.

One opinion being talked about is since Google is worldwide, U.S. anti-trust laws are ill-equipped to handle something like this on such a large scale. Google knows this, some maintain, and is flexing its muscle rather than laying low.

Regardless, this update (known as Panda internally at Google) could be affecting or potentially affect your business’ website.

In recognizing this fact, we strongly urge you check back Monday afternoon for an overview of the things Google penalized sites for and what you can do about them.

Latent Semantic Indexing and Keywords – A New Way to Look at Copy

Recently I learned about a new way to look at keywords… a way that, in one sense, means treating them as almost an afterthought in a way.

Now of course we all understand how people use keywords on Google and even some social media channels to find things they’recomputer-code1 looking for.

Say for example you’re in Florida and trying to find the closest mountain rental cabin to take your family to for vacation. You may search for ‘north Georgia cabin rental,’ or maybe ‘mountain rental cabins closest to Florida’ if you’re using a more long-tail keyword. Google will take this and search their index for those terms and provide you with a list of results.

In a non-technical sense, this is what search engines used to do. They would crawl websites and index keywords but do NO other analysis. The more keywords you had in your content, the better. But anyone whose written content for a website in the last 5 years knows, you can’t simply stuff your content with keywords and get ahead.

(In fact, sites get harshly penalized for this practice now)

Search engines now use more sophisticated approaches to analyzing content. As we know from Google’s latest update, they take a much sharper eye to the content sites use and how they develop it.

And let’s not forget the whole canary in coal mine to begin with – relevancy. Simply analyzing keywords often yielded varied results irrelevant to what the searcher was looking for.

But one method, Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), analyses the context of words and how they’re used on a page. It’s a sophisticated method Google and others use to provide relevant search results to their users.

What Latent Semantic Indexing, or LSI, is on a technical level is a computer algorithm that uses mathematical methods to identify patterns in the relationships of terms and concepts.

What does that mean in English?

Well we all remember good ‘ol grammar school and the days of learning about synonyms, which are different words with the same meaning. Think “car” and “automobile.”

(Don’t worry, I had to look that up to be sure I was correct too   : )

Anyway, that’s easy enough for search engines to identify. But there are words you could call polynyms, or words that have multiple meanings. (Or “a name consisting of multiple words” according to http://en.wiktionary.org/). The opposite of a polynym is a mononym, or a single name.

When you say ‘apple,’ are you referring to the fruit or the computer?

Before LSI, these kinds of terms would confuse search engines. Was a user searching for ‘windows’ looking for new windows for their home or were they looking for information on the popular operating system? It’s difficult to know.

What LSI did was help search engines understand keywords in the context of other words on the page. If a page has ‘apple’ and ‘computer’ and especially ‘MacOS’ on it, then it must be about Apple Computers. If it has ‘apple’ and ‘tree’ and/or ‘pie,’ then it must be about the fruit.

How is this a new way of looking at keywords?

Since LSI is examining the relationships words have with each other rather than their quantity, keywords can often be spaced apart and still be linked together through LSI. Just think about how Google displays results for a 3-4 word term you enter.

Example:

Search term: “how to bake pork chops”

5th result

How To Make Tender and Juicy Pork Chops – Cooking Tips

Want the secret on how to make tender and juicy pork chops? From meat selection to baking in the oven, learn to bake and  cook pork chops perfectly.
www.howtodothings.com › Food & DrinkComfort FoodsCachedSimilar

Learning about LSI has made me wonder if keywords should almost be an afterthought when writing web content, site descriptions and meta-tags.

Keywords of course do belong in your content but do they need to be all together? As this site description shows, the relationships of all the words in this description and site copy told Google the site is about ‘how to bake pork chops.’

While it is difficult, I’m trying to put keywords more on the back burner.

But is LSI something you should fret over too much? Absolutely not says Rand Fishkin of SEOMoz. While it’s something you should know about, it’s by no means a critical component of ranking high in the search engines.

Has anyone ever tried this? Let me know if you have and I’ll certainly report on any progress or data when I have it.

See If You’re Site Has Been Affected by Google’s Panda Update

Google Webmaster is a valuable asset for any online marketer. It allows you to access a plethora of data regarding your website’s rankings, visits, bounce rates and other important metrics for determining how well your SEO efforts are paying off.

As you know from our post on March 4th, Google recently updated its algorithm to weed out sites with less than stellar content.panda Many of the sites affected contained low-quality content that either wasn’t very good or was simply copied from another website.

Affected sites have seen a big drop off – as much as 50% in some cases – of traffic coming from organic (free) search results. This can have devastating impacts for websites dependent on organic traffic to drive leads and revenues.

Likely you would have noticed your site’s drop off in rankings and traffic by now. If so, you can jump ahead and use Google Webmaster to find out which specific pages have been affected.

If you’re at the ‘Dashboard’ for Google Webmaster tools, choose the ‘search engines’ option under ‘traffic sources’ to see a line graph of web traffic. The Panda update occurred around February 22nd so if your site is affected, you will likely see a big drop off in referring traffic after the 22nd of last month.

A big unknown at this point though is whether Google’s Panda update affects all pages on a site or just specific ones. To see a general picture, choose the “top landing pages” option underneath the “Content” section. You can filter the results further to see if Panda affected all pages or just a select few.

Determining this will help identify the specific pages Google considered to be too ‘spammy.’ Once you know this you can then either remove those pages or re-write them with compelling, engaging content. To learn more, read Mark Nunney’s article on Wordtracker to learn more.

Over 12% of websites in the U.S. were affected by this update. As of this writing, this update has only occurred for websites in the United States.

WordPress CMS – The Easiest Way to Build an Optimized Site

It’s almost amazing to think we’ve never talked about how our blogs are setup. You can find lots of information on SEO-e.com and our search engine optimization knowledge center on the power and importance of blogging.

By setup, I mean the actual infrastructure we use to post things to SEO-e and other blogs we handle.

WordPress is an open-source blogging platform used by many websites to build out their pages. Some simply use a URL through WordPress (yoursite.wordpress.com) but to build search rankings for your business, you need to use your own domain…like ours – (http://www.seo-e.com/).

This ensures your site and business get the search engine benefits of building out your site’s content.

WordPress though is more than just a blogging platform. With a few widgets, themes, plugins and coding, it’s also a very usefulwordpress content management system.

According to Wikipedia, a content management system is a “software system which provides website authoring, collaboration and administration tools designed to allow users with little knowledge of web programming languages or markup languages to create and manage the site’s content with relative ease.”

You may have heard of these systems as often being used to manage content on large sites.

The problem with many of them – especially older versions – is that they cause several problems from an SEO perspective…you’ve probably seen some of these before.

Dirty URLs, especially common on large ecommerce sites, is one disadvantage of a content management system. If you see a URL with a ‘?’ in it, all of the characters past the question mark constitute the dirty URL.

Another drawback of content management systems (…especially older ones) is the tendency for content to be placed too deep in a sub-domain, example – http://www.yoursite.com/articles/how-to/use-our-products/model 2613.

Having this occur causes your pages and site to bleed PageRank. As you know, PageRank is a big factor in how Google ranks sites. The higher your PageRank, the better your rankings for the keyword terms you’re targeting.

In other words, websites using older CMS systems to manage their content usually don’t generate web pages crawlable by the search engines.

That’s why many search engine optimization pros like us don’t use them since one of the fundamental tenets to being successful online involves having a site that’s easy for the search engines to crawl and index.

With a few slight modifications though, WordPress is one content management system you can be sure will yield crawlable web pages.

And the best part is once you’re setup with a domain, design, categories and the necessary modifications to make WordPress into a CMS system, it’s as easy as pie to post new content online.

This post and SEO blog is one example of the easiness of this system.

Google Panda Update Causes Some Sites to Lose Traffic, Revenues

Part of our philosophy behind optimizing websites for the search engines is based in the fact that higher search rankings generallyxin_38080227094228151227 lead to higher revenues if your other site elements are done right.

Good SEO most certainly leads to higher rankings. How high also depends on the quality of content, usability and the industry/keywords you’re optimizing for.

Much of the craft of ranking high in the search engines stems from a close watch of what’s going on with Google and the algorithm it uses to crawl and rank sites.

As you may know, there’s over probably 200 factors they consider important.

One of those is content and as I can tell you from personal experience, content is a central pillar to successfully using the Internet to drive leads and revenue to your business.

But some ‘low-quality’ sites are seeing a significant decline in their traffic.

The main reason you ask?

Some interviews with Google spam chief Matt Cutts and Google researcher Amit Singal offer some insights into Google’s Panda update…continue reading for a quick summary.

In late 2009, Google’s Caffeine update improved the search engine’s indexing process. This provided Google with lots of content – some good, some not so good.

Cutts comments in a Wired Magazine interview that many sites were simply producing content from the perspective of “What’s the bare minimum that I can do that’s not spam?”

Without the ability to consistently define what a low-quality site is, many webmasters and SEOs believe Google is utilizing more human reviewers. Cutts and Singal say they’re trying to develop an automatic system to screen this.

Of course, Google doesn’t let the entire cat out of the bag in regards to their algorithm and in a way, understandably so.

But from this interview, we can discern what they’re looking and penalizing sites for.

We can however discern how Google is asking human reviewers several questions to determine if it ‘trusts’ a site or not. And that seems to be the big key – does Google trust your site.

Large domains like CNN.com or Walmart.com generally are trusted.

But smaller sites are looked at more carefully…ones where content seems questionable and untrustworthy to third-party review are seeing some declines in rankings.

The takeaway here?

Be sure you take steps to ensure your site is trustworthy. In regards to content, be sure you put original content online…don’t take things from other people and rehash them. Many of the sites who saw drops in rankings and traffic (one site who lost ground lost 10% of its revenue and had to subsequently reduce staff) were engaging in a practice called ‘content scrubbing’

In essence, content scrubbing is a situation where a site may have content to similar (…or not unique enough) from another site.

It’s not that anyone did anything technically wrong but rather a case where some sites have seen a sudden drop off in rankings and traffic.

Did your website experience any sudden drop like this recently?

If so, drop us a quick comment and tell us about it…if you’re gathering content from various sources and not re-purposing it enough, it’s possible this is the reason.